Imperfect Knowledge, Liquidity and Bubbles

نویسنده

  • William A. Branch
چکیده

This paper demonstrates that insufficient liquidity, in the form of a shortage of safe assets that are useful as collateral in facilitating exchange, can lead to substantial movements in asset prices. There is a single asset that yields a positive payoff stream and can be traded in a centralized market. The asset can also be used to facilitate exchange in decentralized, or over-the-counter, trade and if the asset is in sufficiently short supply the fundamental asset price includes a liquidity premium. Traders, though, have imperfect information about the future price at which the asset will trade and so they behave like a Bayesian who estimates an econometric forecasting model for the asset price that is updated in real-time via discounted least-squares. The paper has three primary results: first, a permanent decrease in the supply of safe assets can lead to a substantial over-shooting of the asset price from its fundamental value; second, an increase in collateral requirements can lead to a substantial overshooting of asset prices; third, when asset prices include a liquidity premium there can be recurrent bubbles and crashes that arise as endogenous responses to economic shocks. The world has a shortage of financial assets. Asset supply is having a hard time keeping up with the global demand for store of value and collateral by households, governments...The equilibrium response of asset prices and valuations to these shortages has played a central role in ... the recurrent emergence of speculative bubbles, the historically low real interest rates ... all fall into place once on adapts this asset shortage perspective. – Ricardo J. Caballero in “On the Macroeconomics of Asset Shortages.”

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Housing Bubbles, Herds and Frenzies: Evidence from British Housing Markets

1 In a world of uncertainty, imperfect information and irreversible decision-making, speculation and information acquisition will generate bubbles, herding and frenzies in housing demand. The instability generated will be further exacerbated by liquidity constraints and institutional change. In this paper, the influence of herds, frenzies and bubbles on housing demand is assessed in the context...

متن کامل

Housing Bubbles and Policy Analysis∗

This paper provides a theory of credit-driven housing bubbles in an infinite-horizon production economy. Entrepreneurs face idiosyncratic investment tax distortions and credit constraints. Housing is an illiquid asset and also serves as collateral for borrowing. A housing bubble can form because houses command a liquidity premium. The housing bubble can provide liquidity and relax credit constr...

متن کامل

Risk Management with Options and Futures under Liquidity Risk

Managing price risk with futures contracts creates liquidity risk through marking to market. Liquidity risk matters in an imperfect capital market where interim losses on a futures position have to be financed at a borrowing rate that is higher than the risk-free rate. However, the impact of liquidity risk can be mitigated using options on futures. This paper analyzes the optimal risk managemen...

متن کامل

Large Investors: Implications for Equilibrium Asset Returns, Shock Absorption, and Liquidity Preliminary and Incomplete

The growing share of financial assets that are held and managed by large institutional investors whose trades move prices contradicts the traditional asset pricing paradigm which assumes markets are competitive with small price-taking players. This paper relaxes the traditional price-taking assumption and instead presents a dynamic multi-asset, multi-large participant model of imperfect competi...

متن کامل

Liquidity and Asset Returns Under Asymmetric Information and Imperfect Competition

We analyze how asymmetric information and imperfect competition affect liquidity and asset prices. Our model has three periods: agents are identical in the first, become heterogeneous and trade in the second, and consume asset payoffs in the third. We show that asymmetric information in the second period raises ex ante expected asset returns in the first, comparing both to the case where all pr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012